Legal Opinion

Hanigan v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 27, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1287PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

This appeal arises out of a complaint petitioning for declaratory relief pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1831 et seq., as amended. Ap-pellees sought a judgment adjudicating the rights and duties of plaintiffs and defendants under a contract; for a judgment declaring the rights and duties of the parties under a “Store Agreement”; for a judgment requiring defendants to consent to the sale of certain property, or in the alternative, for the issuance of a permanent injunction enjoining defendants from interfering with the contractual relations of the plaintiffs.

Defendants-appellants filed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Penthouse Properties, Inc. v. 1158 Fifth Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Gale v. York Center Community Cooperative, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Bank v. Central Mercantile BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Robinson v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1857

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Westfield Centre Service, Inc. v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. In Re KaufmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Tovrea v. UmphressCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Cedar Point Apartments, Ltd. v. Cedar Point Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API