Hanigan v. Wheeler
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a complaint petitioning for declaratory relief pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1831 et seq., as amended. Ap-pellees sought a judgment adjudicating the rights and duties of plaintiffs and defendants under a contract; for a judgment declaring the rights and duties of the parties under a “Store Agreement”; for a judgment requiring defendants to consent to the sale of certain property, or in the alternative, for the issuance of a permanent injunction enjoining defendants from interfering with the contractual relations of the plaintiffs.
Defendants-appellants filed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Penthouse Properties, Inc. v. 1158 Fifth Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Gale v. York Center Community Cooperative, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
- State Bank v. Central Mercantile BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Robinson v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
3Cited by11 opinions
- Westfield Centre Service, Inc. v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- In Re KaufmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Tovrea v. UmphressCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Cedar Point Apartments, Ltd. v. Cedar Point Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.