In Re Kaufman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.;
T1 We are asked to answer two questions: 1 1) whether anti-assignment provisions restricting the power of an annuitant to sell, mortgage, encumber, or anticipate future payments, by assignment or otherwise, are valid; and 2) whether a purchase agreement between an annuitant/assignor and third-party/assignee for future annuity payments in exchange for a lump-sum payment is enforceable if the annuitant is restricted by an anti-assignment provision from selling, mortgaging, encumbering, or anticipating future payments by assignment or otherwise? The questions are answered as follows:…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v. Chemrite (Pty) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. v. Banco Popular Del Peru and the Republic of PeruCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Johnson v. Structured Asset Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Combs v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.