Legal Opinion

In Re Kaufman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 16, 2001No. 96,254PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J.;

T1 We are asked to answer two questions: 1 1) whether anti-assignment provisions restricting the power of an annuitant to sell, mortgage, encumber, or anticipate future payments, by assignment or otherwise, are valid; and 2) whether a purchase agreement between an annuitant/assignor and third-party/assignee for future annuity payments in exchange for a lump-sum payment is enforceable if the annuitant is restricted by an anti-assignment provision from selling, mortgaging, encumbering, or anticipating future payments by assignment or otherwise? The questions are answered as follows:…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v. Chemrite (Pty) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. v. Banco Popular Del Peru and the Republic of PeruCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Structured Asset Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  2. Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. Combs v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API