Legal Opinion

Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1952PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

Defendant, a general contractor, subcontracted with the Kroo Painting Company (hereinafter called Kroo) for the performance by the latter of certain painting work in New York City public schools. Their contracts contained the following prohibitory provision: “ The assignment by the second party [Kroc] of this contract or any interest therein, or of any money due or to become due by reason of the terms hereof without the written consent of the first party [defendant] shall be void.” Kroo subsequently assigned certain rights under the contracts to Marine Midland Trust Company of New York, which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Devlin v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Burck v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Rosenthal Paper Co. v. National Folding Box & Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Fortunato v. . PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v. Chemrite (Pty) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. McCulloch Orthopaedic Surgical Services, PLLC v. Aetna Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. v. Banco Popular Del Peru and the Republic of PeruCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API