Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Watson-Forsberg Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 28, 1992No. C9-90-2637PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Upon petition of Watson-Forsberg, the general contractor in a construction project in St. Anthony, we review a decision of the court of appeals which reversed a partial summary judgment 1 entered in Watson-Forsberg’s favor on its motion for a judicial declaration that it was entitled to indemnification from the third-party defendant-subcontractor Pro-Tech Roof Systems, Inc., to the extent of the insurance specified in the subcontract agreement. We reverse.

Plaintiff Thomas Holmes, an employee of the roofing subcontractor Pro-Tech, was injured on November 16, 1986, when, while…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Independent School District No. 877 v. Loberg Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Christy v. Menasha CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Johnson v. McGough Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Anstine v. Lake Darling Ranch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Holmes v. Watson-Forsberg Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. A.F. Lusi Construction, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  3. Seifert v. Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Katzner v. Kelleher ConstructionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Insurance Company v. Commercial Union Midwest Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API