Legal Opinion

Seifert v. Regents of University of Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 1993No. C7-93-13, C6-93-696PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM J. FLEMING, Judge. *

Appellant NewMech Company, Inc. challenges summary judgment that awarded respondent Regents of the University of Minnesota attorney fees and costs under the indemnity provision in NewMech’s construction contract with the Regents.

FACTS

In October 1984, respondent Regents of the University of Minnesota (Regents) contracted with appellant NewMech Company, Inc. (NewMech) to remodel Smith Hall on the University of Minnesota campus. In April 1985, Robert Seifert, an employee of NewMech, was injured at the job site. Two years later, Seifert sued several parties,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Peter Fabrics, Inc. v. S.S. "Hermes"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Nusbaum v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. American Civil Liberties Union v. Tarek Ibn Ziyad AcademyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  4. PENNANT SERVICE CO., INC. v. True Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Pedro Companies v. Sentry InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API