Legal Opinion

Independent School District No. 877 v. Loberg Plumbing & Heating Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 11, 1963No. 38,735PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Plaintiff, upon dismissal of its action as to certain defendants, appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The problem presented concerns the interpretation of a building construction contract to ascertain the intention of the parties with respect to the contractor’s liability for alleged negligence in causing a fire which extensively damaged a school building after the construction was substantially completed and the budding was accepted and in use by plaintiff.

In the spring of 1956, plaintiff entered into a contract with Patch and Erickson, architects,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Thornton Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. James Quirk Milling Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Foley Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Sommers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Weirick v. Hamm Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API