Anstine v. Lake Darling Ranch, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
Appeal by defendant and third-party plaintiff, Lund-Martin Construction Company, from orders of the District Court of Douglas County granting motions for summary judgment made by a number of third-party defendants and from judgments entered pursuant to said orders.
We affirm.
Summary judgment has been entered in favor of the following third-party defendants-respondents: Acoustics Associates, Inc., Arrigoni Brothers Company, Custom Pools, Inc., Engelen Twin City Company, Glenmar-Hutchinson Company, Gust Lagerquist & Sons, Inc., Pella Products, Inc., and Thompson Lightning Pro…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Thornton Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Carlson v. SmogardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Bridal Veil Lumber Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Christy v. Menasha CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Keefer v. Al Johnson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Sargent v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- National Hydro Systems v. M.A. Mortenson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Johnson v. McGough Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Holmes v. Watson-Forsberg Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.