Legal Opinion

Anstine v. Lake Darling Ranch, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1975No. 45584PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Yetka, Justice.

Appeal by defendant and third-party plaintiff, Lund-Martin Construction Company, from orders of the District Court of Douglas County granting motions for summary judgment made by a number of third-party defendants and from judgments entered pursuant to said orders.

We affirm.

Summary judgment has been entered in favor of the following third-party defendants-respondents: Acoustics Associates, Inc., Arrigoni Brothers Company, Custom Pools, Inc., Engelen Twin City Company, Glenmar-Hutchinson Company, Gust Lagerquist & Sons, Inc., Pella Products, Inc., and Thompson Lightning Pro…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Thornton Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Carlson v. SmogardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Bridal Veil Lumber Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Christy v. Menasha CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Keefer v. Al Johnson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Sargent v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. National Hydro Systems v. M.A. Mortenson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Johnson v. McGough Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Holmes v. Watson-Forsberg Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API