Legal Opinion

Angelus Securities Corp. v. Ball

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1937No. Civ. S. C. 37PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This is a suit by plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, authorized to do and doing business solely in the state of California, against six of its former officers and directors (Harriss, Ball, Cruiekshank, Woodward, Crowe and Breslin) and the executrix (Eva Luton) of the estate of a seventh director (Luton), involving certain transactions that took place in 1931. Jean L. Ferguson and Catherine Lyon are also named defendants, they being the mother and daughter, respectively, of director Luton, and are alleged to have received some of the property here involved.

The first cause of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lofland v. CahallSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
  3. Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Bassett v. FairchildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Graves v. Mono Lake Hydraulic Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lawrence v. I. N. Parlier Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Gamlen Chemical Co. v. GamlenDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Neblett v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API