Neblett v. Elliott
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
In an action to recover damages for libel, the plaintiff charged that the defendants, pursuant to a conspiracy theretofore entered into, caused to be written and published a false and defamatory statement of one Carl Pustau wherein plaintiff, an attorney-at-law, was accused of corruptly influencing or attempting to influence certain high officers of the United States Government. Upon the trial a judgment of nonsuit was entered in favor of each of the defendants and respondents herein John B. Elliott and Ralph B. Gordon. From such judgments this appeal is prosecuted.
So far as the factual…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Estate of BrysonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Herron v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- More v. FingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- McDonnell v. American Leduc Petroleums, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Wetherton v. Growers Farm Labor Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Silver v. ShemanskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Clark v. LesherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.