Ogle v. Hubbel
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County and from an order denying a new trial William 0. Minor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Unlawful detainer. One Barbara Hubbel, mother of C. P. Hubbel, was the owner of the demised premises, and on October 18, 1899, leased the same to the defendant. The lease was for five years, with right of renewal for five years, the term to commence on the day of its execution; the rental being twenty-five dollars per month, payable monthly in advance on the first day of each month. It was further provided that the lessor “may sell said premises during the continuance of this lease either subject to the terms hereof or that such sale may terminate and determine this lease within one year…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Simon Newman Co. v. LassingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Mason v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Johnson v. ChelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Knowles v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richardson v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Pefkaros v. HarmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
- Peerless Department Stores, Inc. v. George M. Snook Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
- Silver v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Sing v. GriblerOregon Supreme Court · 1924