Legal Opinion

Richardson v. King

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1932No. 5784PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

This action was originally instituted in the probate court, as unlawful detainer, expressly under C. S., sec. 7322, but after the answer was filed, at the desire of both parties, removed to the district court, because as they stated title to real estate was involved. Thereafter, and by reason of the matters considered at the trial, the judgment entered, and the contentions on appeal, it is a little difficult to determine just what the nature of the action became, because title is not involved in an unlawful detainer suit. (Reay v. Cotter, 29 Cal. 168; Felton v. Millard, 81 Cal. 540, 21 Pac.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hunter v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Shaner v. Rathdrum State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Felton v. MillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Simon Newman Co. v. LassingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Bekins v. TrullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Loughrey v. WeitzelIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Fry v. WeyenIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. King v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Worthington v. Crazy ThunderIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API