Legal Opinion

Pefkaros v. Harman

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 10, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery to entertain suits in proper cases to enjoin parties from prosecuting proceedings at law has not been questioned since the historical conflict between Chief Justice Coke and Lord Chancellor Ellesmere in the reign of James I. The fact that the Legislature designed the legal remedy under the forcible entry and detainer statute to be a summary one, is no indication of a legislative intent to exempt that remedy from Chancery’s interference in cases where, according to settled principles, equity is in the exercise of its appropriate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marvel v. OrtlipCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1866
  2. Jones v. Charles Warner Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1912
  3. Denny v. FronheiserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Davis v. SchweikertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Ela v. BankesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Knight v. HaleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
  3. Gray Co. v. Alemite Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  4. Malcolm v. LittleSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  5. Diamond Cattle Co. v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API