Legal Opinion

Berg v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1998No. 23663PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

Michael Berg appeals from the district court’s summary dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief. Berg argues: (1) that the prosecutor breached the plea agreement, (2) that the sentence imposed by the district court was an abuse of discretion, and (3) that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Berg pled guilty to one count of forgery and one count of delivery of a controlled substance. In exchange the State agreed to: (1) dismiss several misdemeanor charges, (2) recommend that Berg be released on his own recognizance…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. DeRushé v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. MyersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Barcella v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. McKay v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Timothy Alan Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API