Legal Opinion

Barcella v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 2009No. 35502PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRATTON, Judge.

Gerald A. Bareella appeals from the district court’s denial of his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts giving rise to the charge against Bareella are set forth in this Court’s opinion on Barcella’s direct appeal from his conviction, State v. Barcella, 135 Idaho 191, 16 P.3d 288 (Ct.App.2000), as follows:

The state’s evidence at trial set forth the following fact scenario: On the evening of April 2, 1995, Bareella told Kenneth Thrift-his drinking buddy for the evening, Virginia Smeltzer — the bartender at the Watering Hole…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Grove v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Campos v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Daniel Lee Dixon v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Clayton Robert Adams v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Cullen R. Sims v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API