Barcella v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRATTON, Judge.
Gerald A. Bareella appeals from the district court’s denial of his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The facts giving rise to the charge against Bareella are set forth in this Court’s opinion on Barcella’s direct appeal from his conviction, State v. Barcella, 135 Idaho 191, 16 P.3d 288 (Ct.App.2000), as follows:
The state’s evidence at trial set forth the following fact scenario: On the evening of April 2, 1995, Bareella told Kenneth Thrift-his drinking buddy for the evening, Virginia Smeltzer — the bartender at the Watering Hole…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
- Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Grove v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
- Campos v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
- Daniel Lee Dixon v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- Clayton Robert Adams v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
- Cullen R. Sims v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.