Legal Opinion
Riegel v. Planters State Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 11, 1924No. 11790PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LYONS, C.
In this case the jury found in answer to a special interrogatory that O. B. Riegel, attorney at law, earned a fee in the sum of $250 for services performed by said attorney for the Mountain Park State Bank in the suit of Lewis Terry, Receiver, v. Mountain Park State Bank.
This action is maintained by the personal representative of said O. B. Riegel, an attorney at law, who was deceased prior to the filing of the cause in the district court. Suit was brought against the Planters State Bank, a corporation, and A. M. Trader and A. Y. Britton, who are the defendants in error in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Curran v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Northwestern Trust Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Blackert v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Bowe v. Minnesota Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Skirvin Operating Co. v. Southwestern Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Drug, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
- Claus v. Farmers & Stockgrowers State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Crutchfield v. Marine Power Engine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Exchange Bank of Commerce v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.