Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1930No. 18099PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This action was instituted to recover upon an assigned statutory stockholder’s liability arising out of an insolvent state bank. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the third amended petition. The material facts presented follow:

Defendant Kelly was the owner of $3,000 par value stock of the Blaine County Bank. The Bank Commissioner of the state of Oklahoma, on December 21, 1925, declared said bank insolvent; that official assessed the full statutory liability against the stockholders and, upon! order of the district court of Blaine county, sold the assets of the insolvent bank, including…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Zeigler v. South & North Ala. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  5. Brown v. Sheldon State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Johnson v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Wallace v. GassawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Hood Ex Rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Richardson Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Decker v. DomoneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Hill v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API