Legal Opinion

Crutchfield v. Marine Power Engine Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 2009No. 103,342PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J.;

¶1 The first impression issue presented is whether Marine Power Holding, L.L.C. (MP Holding), a successor company once-removed from Marine Power Engine, Inc. (MP Engine), is liable for a judgment taken against MP Engine. As a general rule, when one company sells or otherwise transfers all its assets to another company, the successor is not liable for the debts and liabilities of the seller. There are exceptions to the rule. In Pulis v. United States Elec. Tool Co., 1977 OK 36, ¶ 5, 561 P.2d 68, we delineated the exceptions as being applicable when:

1) an agreement exists to assume…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Vernon v. SchusterIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Patin v. Thoroughbred Power Boats Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ehrenhaus v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Wells Fargo Vendor Fin. Servs., LLC v. Nationwide Learning, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
  3. Doyle v. New Werner Holding Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. Discover Bank v. BarnesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  5. Ace Oilfield Rentals LLC v. Western Dakota and Fabrication LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API