Legal Opinion
Drug, Inc. v. Hunt
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided March 2, 1933No. 4PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
*351The questions raised by the assignments of error and arguments of counsel are:
1. Did Hunt, the plaintiff below, acting as Receiver for Roberts & Hall, have the right to bring this suit, or were his rights as Receiver confined to the territorial limits of the State of Ohio?
2. Was Household Products, Inc., guilty of conversion when it issued the new certificates to Rosenbaum Grain Corporation for the stock originally issued to Dean, Onativia & Company? It then had no notice of the rights of Roberts & Hall but it did not require the production…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bank v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Kuroda v. SPJS Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- Arnold v. Society for Sayings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Salt Dome Oil Corp. v. SchenckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
- In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- Orzeck v. EnglehartSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.