Legal Opinion
French v. Zalstem-Zalessky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 14, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
The defendant moves pursuant to Rule 30(d), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order terminating or limiting the examination of the Standard Accident Insurance Company, the defendant’s insurance carrier.
The action is to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from alleged negligence on the part of the defendants in the operation of a motor vehicle.
While the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are to be liberally construed, it frequently happens that the court is called upon to determine how far a party may go *509in the examination of a witness as to “any…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McCarthy v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Kenealy v. Texas Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Price v. LevittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Sonken-Galamba Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wild v. PaysonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Porter v. Montaldo'sDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
- Hercules Powder Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1945
- Sarmento v. Edwards Taxi Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942