Hercules Powder Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory judgment1 that defendant’s patent No. 1,808,-893, covering materials for an insecticide, is invalid and that plaintiff is not an infringer. Heekert, patentee-assignor’s deposition has been taken. His testimony shows that while in the employment of defendant from June 1928 to June 1930 he experimented with many aliphatic thiocyanates in order to determine their utility as insecticides. tie found some were, some were not useful. He referred to certain reports, notes and memoranda he had prepared in connection with his experimentation which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- The Incandescent Lamp PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Matheson v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- La Chemise Lacoste v. Alligator Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Dart Industries, Inc. v. Liquid Nitrogen Processing Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.