Legal Opinion

Sonken-Galamba Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided December 21, 1939No. 124PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ two motions to produce documents (one filed December 16, 1939, the other filed December 18, 1939) should be overruled.

Rule 34, Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides that “Upon motion of any party showing good cause therefor and upon notice to all other parties, the court in which an action is pending may (1) order any party to produce and permit the inspection and copying or photographing, by or on behalf of the moving party, of any designated documents, papers, books, accounts, letters photographs, objects, or tangible things,…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Eastern States Corp. v. EislerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  2. Niagara Duplicator Co. v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  3. Hudalla v. Chicago, M., S. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
  4. Archer v. CornillaudDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  5. Texhoma Stores, Inc. v. American Central Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API