Legal Opinion

Broida v. Hayashi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1970No. 4739PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

Broida Properties, Ltd., sublessor, sued to recover unpaid rent from its sublessees, Prank and Helen Hayashi, under , an express covenant to pay rent. From a judgment in favor of tlie Hayashis, Max M. Broida, trustee for the dissolved sublessor corporation, Appeals.

The following facts are pertinent: On August 9, 1954 Industrial Investment Co., Ltd. subleased income producing property to the Hayashis. In 1955, Industrial assigned its interest to Broida Properties. On June 8, 1955, the Hayashis assigned their leasehold estate to Obed and Mildred Hanuna…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Molokai Ranch, Ltd. v. MorrisHawaii Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. Sharpless v. ArnesonHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Peabody v. DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re of the Tax Appeal of Maile Sky Court Co. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Frazier v. Northeast Miss. Shopping CenterMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Union Building Materials Corp. v. Kakaako Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API