Wanless Iron Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*841OPINION.
McMahon :
The petitioner contends that it and the leases involved herein are governmental instrumentalities or agencies of the State of Minnesota for the development and operation of its school lands, dedicated to the support of its public schools; and that therefore it is immune from Federal taxation.
*842It has been held that in maintaining its public schools a state is exercising a “ function strictly governmental in character.” Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 U.S. 123. To the same effect is G. Ridgely Sappington, 25 B.T.A. 1385.
The Supreme Court of the United States has prescribed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Burnet v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hobart Iron Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Citizens Water Works, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
- Hobart Iron Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Wanless Iron Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934