Hunt v. Boyce
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The paper title of the plaintiff failed as to lot 2 in block 1 of Knight’s Addition to the town of Tuckerman, Arkansas. The plaintiff alleged that Charles Parrott had conveyed this lot to his wife, Martha Parrott, but that the deed had been lost. The record contains no proof that Charles Parrott executed a deed to said lot 2 to Martha Parrott. It does show that 'Charles Parrott orally agreed to convey said lot to Martha Parrott, but died without having-executed the deed. Martha Parrott never entered into possession of the lot.
Equity never enforces a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eagle v. OldhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Young v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Shapard v. LesserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Culver v. GillianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Black v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Skelly Oil Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- McCulloch v. McCullochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Akins v. HeidenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Wilcox v. HedwallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.