De Salvo v. Howell Plaza, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Does the plaintiffs’ affidavit, which fails to aver that there is no defense to the action, comply with the requirements of the summary-judgment statute
The defendant in his brief and upon oral argument correctly points out that the plaintiffs’ affidavit failed to incorporate therein the statement required by sec. 270.-635 (2), Stats., “. . . that he believes that there is no defense to the action . . . .” We have previously held that the omission of that statement is fatal to a motion for summary judgment. Szuszka v. Milwaukee (1961), 15 Wis. 2d 241, 112 N. W. 2d 699. However, we pointed out…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- West Side Bank v. Marine National Exchange BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Szuszka v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Peterson v. MaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Townsend v. La Crosse Trailer Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sprecher v. Weston's Bar, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Remmick v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Nixon v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Hasselstrom v. Rex Chainbelt, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Price v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.