Legal Opinion

De Salvo v. Howell Plaza, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Does the plaintiffs’ affidavit, which fails to aver that there is no defense to the action, comply with the requirements of the summary-judgment statute

The defendant in his brief and upon oral argument correctly points out that the plaintiffs’ affidavit failed to incorporate therein the statement required by sec. 270.-635 (2), Stats., “. . . that he believes that there is no defense to the action . . . .” We have previously held that the omission of that statement is fatal to a motion for summary judgment. Szuszka v. Milwaukee (1961), 15 Wis. 2d 241, 112 N. W. 2d 699. However, we pointed out…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. West Side Bank v. Marine National Exchange BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Szuszka v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Peterson v. MaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Townsend v. La Crosse Trailer Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sprecher v. Weston's Bar, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Remmick v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Nixon v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Hasselstrom v. Rex Chainbelt, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Price v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API