Legal Opinion

Leszczynski v. Surges

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1966PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

We conclude the trial court was correct in denying summary judgment although we reach that result on slightly different grounds.

From the complaint we .learn that in 1929 Stanley L. Krzysko owned eight lots, four of which fronted on South Forty-third street and four on South Forty-fourth street in the city of Milwaukee. The back boundaries of these lots were common. These lots and the sunken garden are shown in the diagram. On August 12, 1929, Krzysko conveyed to John Leszczynski and his wife Setryda lots 22, 23, 8, and 9. Setryda was a sister of Mrs. Krzysko. After Setryda Leszczynski’s death…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bond v. HarrelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Dottai v. AltenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Weber v. City of HurleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. McChain v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lambrecht v. Estate of KaczmarczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. L.L.N. v. ClauderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Augustine v. Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cirillo v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API