Peterson v. Maul
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issue before us on this appeal is whether the defendants, Elmwood Motors, Inc., and Mutual Service Casualty Company, are entitled to summary judgment based upon the affidavits submitted.
The reports of the opinions of this court abound with decisions setting forth the rules governing summary judgments. Without citation of authority it can be stated that summary judgment is a drastic remedy and should not be granted if any material facts are in dispute or if the inferences which may reasonably be drawn from the facts are doubtful. It is only when the facts or the reasonable inferences drawn…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schilling v. StockelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Meihost v. MeihostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Bass v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hardscrabble Ski Area, Inc. v. First National Bank of Rice LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Poston v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Jahns v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Bank of Commerce v. PAINE, WEBBER, J. & C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INS. v. KollarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.