Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.
California Supreme Court
1DissentCarter, J.
I dissent.
The majority decision by four justices of this court reaches a new low in search for a reason to reverse a judgment abundantly supported by evidence and based upon the unanimous verdict of a jury. That judgment was approved by a most learned, fair, careful, experienced and able trial judge, and affirmed by the unanimous decision of a District Court of Appeal composed of three learned and able justices with many years of trial and appellate court experience. (Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co., 98 A.C.A. 423 [220 P.2d 398].) Four members of this court (a majority) have reached a…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.