Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1951No. S. F. 18232Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

The majority decision by four justices of this court reaches a new low in search for a reason to reverse a judgment abundantly supported by evidence and based upon the unanimous verdict of a jury. That judgment was approved by a most learned, fair, careful, experienced and able trial judge, and affirmed by the unanimous decision of a District Court of Appeal composed of three learned and able justices with many years of trial and appellate court experience. (Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co., 98 A.C.A. 423 [220 P.2d 398].) Four members of this court (a majority) have reached a…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API