Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Sandpiper Villagers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2007No. 04233; A129071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant — a homeowners association (the association), its board of directors (the board), and its architectural review committee (the ARC) — seeking to quiet title in real property and a declaration that the conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CCRs) that were applicable to plaintiffs property did not require her to trim or cut trees to protect the ocean view of a neighbor. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendant, along with attorney fees. Plaintiff appeals, contending that issues of both law and fact precluded summary judgment. We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kabil Developments Corp. v. MignotOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Staffordshire Investments, Inc. v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. McKAY'S MARKET OF COOS BAY, INC. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Bachmeier v. TuttleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pincetich v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Leahy v. POLARSTAR DEVELOPMENT, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Harnisch v. College of Legal Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Harnisch v. College of Legal Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API