Legal Opinion

Kabil Developments Corp. v. Mignot

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1977No. TC 74-769-L, SC 24651PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for breach of contract. The plaintiff, Kabil Developments Corporation, alleged an oral agreement that Inland Helicopters, a business owned by defendants E. W. and Peggy Mignot, would provide Kabil with helicopter services needed for a construction job which Kabil contracted to perform for the United States Forest Service. Defendants denied that there was a contract. In addition to a general denial, they pleaded that their agent, Mr. Honeycutt, had stated he would have to examine and approve the job site for safe, practical, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Kitzke v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Vancil v. PoulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Harty v. ByeOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Remington v. LandoltOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. SR International Business Insurance v. World Trade Center Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. United States National Bank v. BogeOregon Supreme Court · 1991

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API