Kabil Developments Corp. v. Mignot
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for breach of contract. The plaintiff, Kabil Developments Corporation, alleged an oral agreement that Inland Helicopters, a business owned by defendants E. W. and Peggy Mignot, would provide Kabil with helicopter services needed for a construction job which Kabil contracted to perform for the United States Forest Service. Defendants denied that there was a contract. In addition to a general denial, they pleaded that their agent, Mr. Honeycutt, had stated he would have to examine and approve the job site for safe, practical, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Kitzke v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Vancil v. PoulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Harty v. ByeOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Remington v. LandoltOregon Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by50 opinions
- Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- SR International Business Insurance v. World Trade Center Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- United States National Bank v. BogeOregon Supreme Court · 1991
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.