Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Harnisch v. College of Legal Arts, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 25, 2011No. 080710135; A140802Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff Lee entered into a written enrollment agreement with defendant College of Legal Arts, Inc., “for instruction in the skills necessary for the profession of’ court reporting. The enrollment agreement included a provision on the front side of the two-sided contract that provided, under the caption “NOTICE TO STUDENT”:

“By signing this enrollment agreement you acknowledge that you have read it completely and understand its content and that you have received a completed copy of this contract and its attachments, including the school catalog, with insertions. The terms and conditions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hekker v. Sabre Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Valenti v. HopkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Berry v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Andrews v. Sandpiper Villagers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API