Legal Opinion
Pincetich v. Nolan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 29, 2012No. 092110; A144751PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment that dismissed his claims against defendants on summary judgment after the trial court concluded that ORS 701.131(1) barred him from commencing an action against them to recover compensation allegedly owed him for his work under a construction contract. We affirm.
Defendants contracted to pay plaintiff $286,271 to construct a residence. After plaintiff began to perform the contract, the Construction Contractors Board (CCB) suspended plaintiff’s license to perform construction work because he had allowed his liability insurance to lapse. The CCB reinstated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parsons v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Andrews v. Sandpiper Villagers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. KUPERUSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
3Cited by6 opinions
- PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Atkeson v. T & K Lands, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Stellar J Corp. v. Smith & Loveless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Stellar J Corp. v. Smith & Loveless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Sugarman v. IRZ Consulting, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.