Legal Opinion

Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Eaton

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 3, 1952No. Civil Action No. 646, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Herrmann, J.:

The pending motions present two ultimate questions for decision:

1. Where there is a valid attachment of some property of the defendant in an action begun by writ of foreign attachment, will the effectiveness of a garnishment of other property, rights or credits of the defendant be determined upon motion made under special appearance for the purpose of challenging the jurisdiction of the Court?

2. In an action commenced by writ of foreign attachment, may a defendant be permitted to enter a special appearance for the purpose of defending the action on its merits with liability…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. Cheshire National Bank v. JaynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Salmon Falls Mfg. Co. v. Midland Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. Syracuse Trust Co. v. KellerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
  5. State v. McDowellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Canaday v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  2. Sands v. Lefcourt Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  3. Chrysler Corporation v. DannSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Brainard v. CanadaySuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
  5. Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. EatonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API