Legal Opinion
Brainard v. Canaday
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided March 30, 1955No. 1246, Civil Action, 1953PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Terry, J.:
This action originated as a cause of action in foreign attachment in pursuance to the provisions of Section 3506, Title 10, Delaware Code, 1953. The complaint with the required affidavit was filed on December 22, 1953. A writ of foreign attachment was issued and was served on the same day by the Sheriff upon The Corporation Trust Company, the corporate resident agent of two Delaware corporations, Empire Securities, Inc. and Willys Overland Motors, Inc.
On January 11, 1954, The Corporation Trust Company, resident agent, delivered to the Sheriff a certificate designating the number of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- United States v. Colorado & N. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Bantum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Canaday v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Canaday v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Application of Wilmington Suburban Water Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Application of Wilmington Suburban Water Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1964
- Osborn v. White Eagle Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.