Legal Opinion

Cheshire National Bank v. Jaynes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 15, 1916PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action of contract brought by a national banking corporation domiciled in the State of New Hampshire against a resident of the State of Connecticut, upon whom no personal service has been made but whose property has been attached by trustee process under the statute making provision for reaching the property of a non-resident. R. L. c. 170. The defendant filed a special appearance, whereby he has undertaken by apt words not to submit himself generally to the jurisdiction of the court, but only so far as is necessary in order to protect his interest in the goods, effects and credits…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Minichiello v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Rollins v. Bay View Auto Parts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Morrill v. TongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Rogan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API