Legal Opinion
Syracuse Trust Co. v. Keller
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided November 21, 1932No. Nos. 145PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pennewill, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The argument of defendant in cases 145 and 129 is mainly to the point that a suit cannot be maintained against a corporation after a general receiver has been appointed therefor. We are unable to see what this contention has to do with the service of process, the validity of which .is attacked. Special appearance by a defendant is, as we understand it, for the purpose of showing that the *308service was invalid, and not that the plaintiff had sued the wrong party.
What questions can be raised under a special appearance? In 4 Corpus Juris, at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Shushereba v. AmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- McKee v. Standard Minerals Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
- Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Gesell v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Monacelli v. GrimesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Wise v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
- Webb Packing Co. v. HarmonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
- In Re the Appeal of HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.