Legal Opinion

Canaday v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 30, 1955No. 4, 1955PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, J.:

This is a petition for a writ of prohibition 1 to end further proceedings in an action pending in the Superior Court of New Castle County. The action was filed by Brainard, the intervening respondent here, against Canaday for brokerage fees, and was commenced by a writ of foreign attachment and the purported seizure under it of Canaday’s stock in a Delaware corporation.

After the purported seizure, Canaday petitioned the, Superior Court for leave to appear specially in the action in order to attack the validity of the writ of foreign attachment and the seizure under it. His…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ownbey v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  3. Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Bantum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. Carlson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Desert Equities, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund, II, L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Moran v. Household International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1985
  5. Mann v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API