Legal Opinion

Embrico v. United States Steel Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 16, 2007No. 05-5495UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of United States Steel Corp. (U.S.Steel) and against Appellants Nick Embrico (Embrico), Frank Vitucci (Vitucci), and Roy Williams (Williams). Appellants are three former U.S. Steel managers who, after accepting a voluntary early retirement plan (VERP), brought claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, Pa. Stat. Ann. Tit. 43 §§ 951 et seq. (PHRA), and the Employee Retirement Income Security…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Keith A. Hill v. Borough of Kutztown and Gennaro Marino, Mayor of Kutztown, in His Individual and Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Andreoli v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Robert R. Henn v. National Geographic SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ilori v. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Sorgini v. Wissahickon School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. BAYLIS v. SCANTEK, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. CHANDLER v. LA-Z-BOY, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. CHANDLER v. LA-Z-BOY, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API