Legal Opinion
Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & Higgins
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 14, 1995No. 94-5208PublishedCited by 447 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
On March 9, 1994, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Johnson & Higgins (“J & H”), the employer of appellant Burt Sempier. Sempier now appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) claim, 29 U.S.C. § 623 (1988), 1 and the discretionary dismissal of his pendent state law claims. He also raises as error the district court’s substitution of a “Bill of Particulars” in place of his interrogatories.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to review the March 9, 1994…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by447 opinions
- Holifield v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Sandra L. SIMPSON Appellant, v. KAY JEWELERS, DIVISION OF STERLING, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
442 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.