Legal Opinion

BAYLIS v. SCANTEK, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00828Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHANIE BAYLIS : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : SCANTEK, INC. : NO. 24-828 MEMORANDUM Bartle, J. September 17, 2024 Pro se plaintiff Stephanie Baylis worked for Scantek, Inc. from June 2022 until her resignation in February 2023. She has sued Scantek, alleging that it discriminated against her on the basis of her disability and that it failed to accommodate her pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. Before the court is the motion of defendant Scantek, Inc. to dismiss the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Alan Schmidt v. John SkolasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API