Legal Opinion

School District No. 1 v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

There are two separate and distinct contracts treated as one by the Industrial Commission and the trial court. One contract is between the School District No. 1, Town of Hiles, and George Wald. This contract contemplated the renewing of the roof upon the school build*246ing of the district, and under it Wald engaged to place a new roof over the old one, doing the work and furnishing the material for the stipulated sum of $500. The terms and conditions of this contract made Wald an independent contractor. Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial Comm. 200 Wis. 127, 227 N. W. 288; Kneeland-McLurg Lttmber…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Kneeland-McLurg Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Madison Entertainment Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baer v. Armour CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API