California Telephone & Light Co. v. Jordan
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for writ of mandate to the Secretary of State. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as Secretary of State of the state of California, to file, nunc pro tunc, as of date of March 21, 1912, in his said office of Secretary of State, a certified copy of the amended articles of incorporation of the petitioner.
The petitioner, whose principal place of business is in the city of Santa Rosa, county of Sonoma, was duly formed as a corporation on the eighth day of November, 1911, and its original articles of incorporation, duly executed and such execution duly acknowledged, were on the twenty-second day of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R. v. Continental Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Martin v. DeetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Capps & McCreary v. Hastings Prospecting Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- People Ex Rel. Weatherly v. Golden Gate Lodge No. 6California Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- Randle v. Winona Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Anthony Theophilos Patricia A. Theophilos v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- State v. DobrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Lloyd v. RamsaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Tognazzini v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.