Legal Opinion

Martin v. Deetz

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1894No. 18131PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs against Alva Jacob Deetz, George Lewis Deetz, Susannah D. Hathaway, Mary Polly Metcalf, Mary Elizabeth Deetz, and Henry John Deetz, who are called in the papers the Deetz family, upon a note and mortgage made by them on April 15, 1891, for $22,000, to M. A. Harding, and assigned by the latter to the Bank of California, and by said bank to the plaintiffs herein. The mortgage was upon certain timber lands, with a sawmill thereon, owned by said Deetz family. The Deetz family, in their answer, set up certain defenses, and upon cer*58tain allegations made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Lakeside Ditch Co. v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Friend & Terry Lumber Co. v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Anderson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Fraser v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API