Tognazzini v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus directed to the Secretary of State of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Petitioners prayed for a writ of mandamus requiring the secretary of state to file, nunc pro tune as of the ninth day of August, 1912, a certified copy of a certificate of amendment of the articles of incorporation of the Swiss-American Bank. An alternative writ was issued and the matter is now before us for final consideration of the points of law involved, there being no controversy with reference to the facts.
The Swiss-American Bank was incorporated for the term of fifty years on the tenth day of August, 1909. Subsequently, by a contract made and executed in accordance with the “Bank Act”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Tinkham v. . TapscottNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Commonwealth v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- California Telephone & Light Co. v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- All Points Traders, Inc. v. Barrington AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mono County v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. ArthurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Cooper v. United Benefit Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Nezik v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.