Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R. v. Continental Trust Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. The appeal in the principal case, styled as above, is an appeal by the railroad company, and various intervening creditors of that company, from a decree foreclosing a first mortgage made by said railroad company to secure an issue of its bonds aggregating §9,000,000, and directing a sale of all of its property and franchises, and dismissing various intervening petitions filed by unsecured…
Read the full summary
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. The appeal in the principal case, styled as above, is an appeal by the railroad company, and various intervening creditors of that company, from a decree foreclosing a first mortgage made by said railroad company to secure an issue of its bonds aggregating §9,000,000, and directing a sale of all of its property and franchises, and dismissing various intervening petitions filed by unsecured creditors of said mortgagor railroad company attacking the validity of its mortgage bonds upon various grounds, and…
1Opinion of the Court
iXllTOX'. Circuit Judge,
after malting the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.
The principal questions arising upon the assignment of errors filed by the railroad company or the intervening general creditors are these: (1) Hid the court have jurisdiction to entertain1 the foreclosure suit? (2) If Hie court had jurisdiction, did it err in hearing and deciding the issues which were raised under the foreclosure suit without deciding all of the issues raised in the creditors’ suit? (3) Did the court err in holding that the railroad company was at least: a corporation…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- MacAlister v. GutermaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Continental Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Gaskill v. Gladys Belle Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.