Legal Opinion
Union Pacific Railroad v. Surface Transportation Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 3, 2004No. 02-1340PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
Separate opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON concurring in the judgment.
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge:
In an arbitration over benefits for workers adversely affected by a rail merger, the arbitrators decided the core liability issues against the carrier. The Surface Transportation Board declined to set aside or modify the award. The carrier appeals (now in the form of Union Pacific as successor by merger to the original acquiring firm). Applying the highly deferential standard of review that the Board claims is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Timothy W. Black and Thomas K. Sorge v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Grand Trunk Western Railroad, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Andresen v. Intepros Federal, IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Black v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.