Legal Opinion
Timothy W. Black and Thomas K. Sorge v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2007No. 06-3045PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Timothy Black and Thomas Sorge challenge a decision of the Surface Transportation Board affirming an arbitration panel’s ruling denying them relief under a railroad merger labor protection agreement. We deny the petition.
I
In 1979, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) approved the Grand Trunk Western Railroad’s acquisition of the Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Company and the Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company. See Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.-Control-Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Co., 360 I.C.C. 498, 1979 WL 11064 (1979). The ICC conditioned its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. GarveySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Michigan Family Resources, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union Local 517mCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Boston & Maine Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- P.R. Tel. Co. v. Worldnet Telecomm., Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009