Legal Opinion

Driskill v. Thompson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1956No. Civ. 16648PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

The plaintiff, Joseph W. Driskill, and defendants Ted R. Thompson and Stanley Kruse, on March 11, 1950, entered into an oral partnership agreement to conduct dances in a rented hall in San Francisco. Each partner contributed $500 to the project. It was agreed that the plaintiff should check the cash, act as a special police officer, supervise personnel, and also should perform some janitorial services. Defendant Kruse, it was agreed, should tend bar and perform some janitorial services. Defendant Thompson played in the band. Plaintiff and Kruse, by agreement, got paid a small salary for their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Larrus v. First National Bank of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Smith v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Neptune Society Corp. v. LonganeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API