State Ex Inf. Danforth v. Dale Curteman, Inc.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, Commissioner.
The State, on information of the Attorney General, at the relation of the members of the State Board of Optometry, filed a quo warranto proceeding against Dale Curteman, Inc., a corporation, and Dale Curteman, individually, seeking the forfeiture of the corporate charter and an injunction forbidding both respondents and their employees from engaging in certain practices alleged to constitute the illegal practice of optometry without a certificate of registration as a registered optometrist issued by the state board of optometry, in violation of § 336.020 of Chapter 336 of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Attorney General v. Kenco Optics, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Watson v. House of VisionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Figgs v. Bellevue Holding Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1994
- Missouri Dental Board v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.