State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. Missouri Utilities Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, J.'
This is an information in the nature of quo warranto, filed by the Attorney General at the relation of the eity of California, by which it is sought to oust the respondent from the use of the streets, allejrs, and public places of said city for the maintenance of its electric light and power lines and equipment. The return sets up defenses of equitable estoppel, lack of jurisdiction of this court to enforce the ouster, deprivation of respondent’s property without due process, and a defense in the nature of a plea in abatement on the ground that there is another action, involving…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Kirk v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Lohmeyer v. St. Louis Cordage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Davis v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- City of Summerville v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Miskimen v. Kansas City Star Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.